When “Tricky” Becomes a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) hearing has revealed disturbing trends in how certain individuals and organizations view tax laws and ethics. Robert Assaf, a NSW Liberal apparatchik and Reformers member, dodged questions about fake invoices sent for work that was never carried out, describing them as part of a “tricky” tax scheme rather than dishonesty.

This defense of using the term “tricky” to describe apparent tax evasion is not just a minor semantic quibble. It’s a symptom of a broader cultural problem within certain segments of Australian politics and society. When “tricky” becomes a euphemism for breaking the law, it undermines trust in institutions and sets a disturbing precedent.

Assaf’s testimony raises questions about the accountability of those who use such tactics to further their interests. If individuals like Assaf characterize tax evasion as merely “tricky,” rather than dishonest, what does this say about their understanding of right and wrong? Do they genuinely believe that exploiting loopholes in the system is an acceptable way to conduct business?

The ICAC inquiry has been probing whether undeclared political donations were made by prohibited donors to a company called Beckington. Assaf’s testimony suggests he was aware of the concept of illegal donations but chose not to investigate further, instead relying on his own interpretation of what constitutes “tricky” conduct.

This lack of transparency and accountability is deeply troubling. When individuals in positions of power use language like “tricky” to describe blatant tax evasion, it creates a culture where the ends justify the means. This culture values expediency over ethics, and those who engage in such behavior often avoid consequences.

The ICAC inquiry has already heard testimony from several key witnesses, including Senior right-wing MP Damien Tudehope, who will appear before the commission on Monday. Tudehope has denied any wrongdoing and is not a person of interest, but his ties to many of the witnesses raise further questions about the influence of certain individuals and groups within Australian politics.

The ICAC inquiry is an important step towards holding those in power accountable for their actions. However, it also serves as a reminder that there is still much work to be done in terms of promoting transparency and accountability within Australian society. When “tricky” becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card, it’s time to take a hard look at the values and principles that underpin our institutions.

Assaf’s testimony has shed light on a disturbing trend that goes beyond just tax evasion. It raises questions about the accountability of those in power and the culture of entitlement that pervades certain segments of Australian society. The ICAC inquiry is an opportunity to address these issues head-on, but it will require more than just clever wordplay to fix the problems that have been revealed.

As the inquiry continues, it’s essential that we keep a close eye on those who use language like “tricky” to justify their actions. We must demand greater transparency and accountability from our leaders, and hold them to account when they fail to meet these standards. Anything less would be a betrayal of the public trust.

The ICAC inquiry has already identified systemic issues that allow such behavior to persist. It’s clear that cultural shifts are necessary to prevent similar problems in the future. As we continue to follow this story, let’s keep our eyes on the bigger picture – and demand more from those who are supposed to serve the public interest.